Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

R 0006/15 () of 25.4.2016

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2016:R000615.20160425

Date of decision:

25 April 2016

Case number:

R 0006/15

Petition for review of:

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

B

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 27Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Device for orienting the external rear-view mirrors of a vehicle to void the moment of dead angle

Applicant name:

Serra, Alessandro

Opponent name:

AUDI AG

Board:

EBA

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 23(4)
European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(b)
European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)
European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(d)
European Patent Convention R 104(a)
European Patent Convention R 104(b)
European Patent Convention R 106
European Patent Convention R 109(2)(a)
European Patent Convention R 113(1)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(4)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(6)

Keywords:

Petition for review - clearly unallowable

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

R 0002/08
R 0009/08
R 0008/09
R 0013/09
R 0016/09
R 0004/11

Citing decisions:

R 0001/16
R 0006/17

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r150006eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

17 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.23 EPC Independence of the members of the Boards

X A.112 EPC Decision or opinion of the Enlarged Board of Appeal

X A.112a EPC Article 112a Petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal

EPC Implementing Rules

X R.104 EPC Further fundamental procedural defects

X R.106 EPC Obligation to raise objections

X R.109 EPC Procedure in dealing with petitions for review

X R.113 EPC Signature, name, seal

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V B 3.4.2 Grounds listed exhaustively

X CLR V B 3.4.3 No suspensory effect – review of substantive law excluded

General Case Law

X R 0002/08 (Violation fondamentale de l'article 113/VSL International) of 11.9.2008

X R 0009/08 (Fundamental violation of Article 113/SULZER) of 21.1.2009

X R 0008/09 (Fundamental violation of Article 113) of 23.9.2009

X R 0013/09 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/ALCON) of 22.10.2009

X R 0016/09 () of 19.5.2010

X R 0004/11 (Pour spout fitments/ELOPAK SYSTEMS) of 16.4.2012

X R 0001/16 (Antrag auf ÃberprÃ¼fung) of 22.5.2017

X R 0006/17 (Petition partially clearly inadmissible and partially clearly … of 28.5.2018