|European Case Law Identifier:||ECLI:EP:BA:2002:J000801.20020606|
|Date of decision:||06 June 2002|
|Case number:||J 0008/01|
|IPC class:||A61K 7/48|
|Language of proceedings:||EN|
|Download and more information:||
|Title of application:||Serine protease and topical retinoid compositions|
|Applicant name:||Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.|
|Headnote:||1. The jurisdiction of a (purported) designated Office according to Article 26 PCT covers the issue of whether an omitted designation can be validly added or not.
2. Publication of a correction concerning designations should address the same public as the publication of the wrong data to safeguard the interest of the public.
|Relevant legal provisions:|
|Keywords:||International patent application - correction under Rule 88 EPC
Jurisdiction of the EPO as a (purported) designated office to decide on a request for correction
Balancing rights of third parties with those of the applicant
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
16 references found.Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.
PCT Implementing Rules
Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)