Any amendment, including any made by applicants of their own volition, must satisfy the following conditions:
If the amendments do not meet these conditions, the applicants should be told that the amended application cannot be allowed. Apart from the amendments referred to in C‑III, 2.1 and C-III, 2.2, which are admissible under Rule 137(2), the applicants may correct obvious errors at any time (see H‑VI, 2.2.1).
If amendments are made and these are not identified and/or their basis in the application as filed not indicated by the applicants (see H‑III, 2.1) and the application is one of those mentioned in H‑III, 2.1.4, the examining division may send a communication according to Rule 137(4) requesting the applicants to provide this information (see H‑III, 2.1.1).
If applicants accept a search division's suggestion regarding an acceptable form of amendment of the claims to overcome the objections raised (see B-XI, 3.8), applicants are requested to adapt the description to the claims on file and delete or amend any statements or expressions which throw doubt on the scope of protection (see F‑IV, 4.3).
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/guidelines/e/c_iii_2.htm
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
24 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
EPC Implementing Rules
EPO Guidelines - A Formalities Examination
EPO Guidelines - B Search
EPO Guidelines - C Procedureal Aspects of Substantive Examination
XGL C III 2.2 Amendments made in response to the WO‑ISA, IPER or supplementary international search report