Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

T 0698/10 () of 27.4.2015

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2015:T069810.20150427

Date of decision:

27 April 2015

Case number:

T 0698/10

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

C

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 493Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Method and apparatus for signaling and decoding AVS1-P2 bitstreams of different versions

Applicant name:

Broadcom Corporation

Opponent name:

-

Board:

3.5.04

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 56
European Patent Convention R 106
European Patent Convention Art 113(1)
European Patent Convention R 103(1)(a)

Keywords:

Inventive step - closest prior art
Inventive step - ex post facto analysis (no)
Right to be heard - opportunity to comment (yes)

Catchwords:

see section 3

Cited decisions:

R 0001/08
R 0002/08
R 0012/09
T 0388/89
T 0686/91
T 1019/99
T 0835/00
T 1557/07
T 1898/07

Citing decisions:

R 0019/12
T 1379/11
T 1466/12
T 2085/12
T 1185/13
T 2132/13
T 1881/14
T 2215/14
T 0314/15
T 1148/15
T 0628/16
T 0638/16
T 2090/16
T 2115/17

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t100698eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

23 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.56 EPC Inventive step

X A.113 EPC Right to be heard and basis of decisions

EPC Implementing Rules

X R.103 EPC Reimbursement of appeal fees

X R.106 EPC Obligation to raise objections

Case Law Book: I Patentability

X CLR I D 2 Problem and solution approach

X CLR I D 3.1 Determination of closest prior art in general

X CLR I D 3.3 Similarity of the technical problem

X CLR I D 3.4.1 General

Case Law Book: III Amendments

X CLR III B 2.4.3 No obligation to address each and every argument

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V A 9.5.9 Inadequate reasons given in the decision at first instance

General Case Law

X R 0001/08 () of 15.7.2008

X R 0002/08 (Violation fondamentale de l'article 113/VSL International) of 11.9.2008

X R 0012/09 () of 15.1.2010

X R 0019/12 (Ablehnung wegen Besorgnis der Befangenheit) of 25.4.2014

X T 0388/89 () of 26.2.1991

X T 0686/91 (Photobase/James River Graphics) of 30.6.1994

X T 1019/99 (Contrast enhancement/AGFA-GEVAERT) of 16.6.2004

X T 0835/00 () of 7.11.2002

X T 1557/07 () of 9.7.2008

X T 1898/07 (Interferon Formulations/BIOGEN) of 17.6.2010

X T 1379/11 (Audit trail/SAP) of 25.10.2016

X T 1466/12 (System aus mehreren Inkubatoren/INHECO) of 10.11.2015

X T 1185/13 () of 21.9.2018