| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2012:T013410.20120522 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 22 May 2012 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0134/10 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 02739803.1 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C11D 17/08 A61Q 5/02 A61Q 5/12 A61Q 19/10 A61K 8/34 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Shampoos with behenyl alcohol | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Colgate-Palmolive Company | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | The Procter & Gamble Company Sasol Germany GmbH |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.06 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of the clarity objection (yes): unclarity arising from the amendments to the granted claim Clarity (all requests): no - functional definition of optional component not delimiting clearly the extent of claim 1 directed to a composition of matter consisting of the listed components |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t100134eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021