| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1999:T086095.19991027 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 27 October 1999 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0860/95 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 88106910.8 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B01J 23/94 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Method of reactivating catalyst | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Nippon Shokubai Kagaku Kogyo Co., Ltd. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Rhone-Poulenc Chimie | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Clarity of a relative expression Inventive step (yes) not obvious to try Closest state of the art - identification without the benefit of hindsight |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t950860eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021