| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1996:T064391.19960918 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 18 September 1996 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0643/91 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 84111763.3 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B32B 27/32 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Packaging laminate and use thereof | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | AB Tetra Pak | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | 1. Unilever N.V. 2. International Paper Company |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.03 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of one of the appeals (no) - party to the proceedings as of right Clarity (yes) - expression sufficiently clear to discern the claimed subject-matter from the prior art Closest document - addresses the same problem as the patent in suit Inventive step (yes) - no hint at the relevance of desired properties, nor at the specific blend resulting in those properties |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t910643eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
