Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

R 0007/14 () of 18.2.2016

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2016:R000714.20160218

Date of decision:

18 February 2016

Case number:

R 0007/14

Petition for review of:

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

B

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 28Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

A method and system for transporting live poultry

Applicant name:

GIORDANO POULTRY-PLAST S.p.A.
Zanotti, Massimo

Opponent name:

STORK PMT B.V.

Board:

EBA

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)
European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(d)
European Patent Convention R 104

Keywords:

Petition for review clearly unallowable - yes

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

R 0004/08
R 0010/08
R 0014/10
R 0006/11
R 0019/11
T 0911/99
T 0492/00
T 0764/06
T 1570/07

Citing decisions:

-

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r140007eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

14 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.112a EPC Article 112a Petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal

EPC Implementing Rules

X R.104 EPC Further fundamental procedural defects

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V B 3.4.2 Grounds listed exhaustively

X CLR V B 3.6.6 Compliance with Rule 106 EPC EPC left open

X CLR V B 3.10.2 Involvement of parties other than the petitioner in petition for review proceedings

X CLR V B 4.3.6 Boards' obligation to remain neutral

X CLR V B 4.3.9 Timing of a decision allegedly surprising

X CLR V B 4.4.2 ‍‍Rule 104(b) EPC – failure to decide on a party's request

General Case Law

X R 0004/08 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/CANON) of 20.3.2009

X R 0010/08 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC and procedural defect under … of 13.3.2009

X R 0014/10 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 and R. 104(b) EPC) of 26.1.2011

X R 0006/11 (Petition for review/DU PONT) of 4.11.2011

X R 0019/11 () of 2.10.2012

X T 0764/06 (Crystalline form of atorvastatin/WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC) of 25.2.2009