GL F IV 4.18 Reference signs

If the application contains drawings, and the comprehension of the claims is improved by establishing the connection between the features mentioned in the claims and the corresponding reference signs in the drawings, then appropriate reference signs need to be placed in parentheses after the features mentioned in the claims. If there are a large number of different embodiments, only the reference signs of the most important embodiments need be incorporated in the independent claim(s).

GL F IV 4.17 References to the description or drawings

As indicated in Rule 43(6), the claims must not, in respect of the technical features of the invention, rely on references to the description or drawings "except where absolutely necessary". In particular they must not normally rely on such references as "as described in part ... of the description", or "as illustrated in Figure 2 of the drawings".[Rule 43(6); ]
The emphatic wording of the excepting clause is to be noted.

GL F IV 4.16 Use claims

For the purposes of examination, a "use" claim in a form such as "the use of substance X as an insecticide" is regarded as equivalent to a "process" claim of the form "a process of killing insects using substance X". Thus, a claim in the form indicated is not to be interpreted as directed to the substance X recognisable (e.g. by further additives) as intended for use as an insecticide.

GL F IV 4.14.1 Clarity objections

Once it has been established if a claim is directed to either one entity or to a combination of entities, the wording of the claim must be adapted appropriately to reflect it; otherwise the claim is objected to under Art. 84.
For example, in the case of a claim directed to a single entity, the first entity is "connectable" to the second entity; in the case of a claim directed to a combination of entities the first entity is "connected" to the second entity.

GL F IV 4.13.3 Interpretation of expressions such as "Method for ..."

In the context of a method, two different types of stated purpose are possible, namely those that define the application or use of a method, and those that define an effect arising from the steps of the method and are implicit therein (see T 1931/14).
Where the stated purpose defines the specific application of the method, this purpose requires additional steps which are not implied by or inherent in the other remaining steps defined in the claim, and without which the claimed process would not achieve the s

Pages

Subscribe to XEPC: EPC and PCT resource RSS