CLR II A 6.3.3 Interpretation of ambiguous terms or confirmation of the text of a claim Read more about CLR II A 6.3.3 Interpretation of ambiguous terms or confirmation of the text of a claim
CLR II A 6.3.2 Relevance of Article 69 EPC Read more about CLR II A 6.3.2 Relevance of Article 69 EPC
CLR II A 6.3 Using description and drawings to interpret the claims 6.3.1 General principles 6.3.2 Relevance of Article 69 EPC 6.3.3 Interpretation of ambiguous terms or confirmation of the text of a claim Read more about CLR II A 6.3 Using description and drawings to interpret the claims
CLR II A 6.2 Meaning of terms and phrases: "comprising (substantially)", "consisting (essentially) of", "containing" Read more about CLR II A 6.2 Meaning of terms and phrases: "comprising (substantially)", "consisting (essentially) of", "containing"
CLR II A 6 Interpretation of claims 6.1. General principles 6.2. Meaning of terms and phrases: "comprising (substantially)", "consisting (essentially) of", "containing" 6.3. Using description and drawings to interpret the claims Read more about CLR II A 6 Interpretation of claims
CLR II A 5.3 Bringing the description into line with amended claims Read more about CLR II A 5.3 Bringing the description into line with amended claims
CLR II A 5.2 Restrictions on generalising the technical information and examples adduced in the description Read more about CLR II A 5.2 Restrictions on generalising the technical information and examples adduced in the description
CLR II A 5.1 General principles Art. 84 EPC stipulates that the claims must be supported by the description. This requirement means that the subject-matter of the claim must be taken from the description and it is not admissible to claim something which is not described. Read more about CLR II A 5.1 General principles