| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1999:T106696.19990708 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 08 July 1999 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1066/96 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 91104573.0 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G02B 26/10 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Scanning optical device | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.4.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Basis of decisions - opportunity to comment (no): intention to exercise discretion under R. 86(3) EPC negatively not communicated before refusal Substantial procedural violation (yes) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t961066eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
5 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Case Law Book: IV Divisional Applications
XCLR IV B 3.3.3 Criteria for admitting amendments filed in reply to the Rule 71(3) EPC communication
