| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1994:T046992.19940909 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 09 September 1994 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0469/92 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 87306595.7 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A61F 5/448 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Ostomy coupling | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Laboratoires Merck-Clevenot | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Novelty - state of the art Inventive step - (no) Priority - previous application without claims Reimbursement of appeal fees - substantial procedural violation (no) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
Rule 67 EPC applies only to a procedural violation by the instance whose decision is under appeal (point 6 of the decision). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t920469eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
9 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application
XCLR II D 3.1.2 G 2/98 and the concept of disclosure – interpretation in the same way as for Art. 123(2) EPC
Case Law Book: V Priority
XCLR V A 9.5.3 Procedural violation must be committed by the department whose decision is under appeal