European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1992:T023390.19920708 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 08 July 1992 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0233/90 | ||||||||
Application number: | 83306618.6 | ||||||||
IPC class: | G11B 5/70 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | B | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Magnetic recording medium | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Konica Corporation | ||||||||
Opponent name: | 01) Bayer AG, Leverkusen Konzernverwaltung RP 02) BASF Aktiengesellschaft, Ludwigshafen |
||||||||
Board: | 3.3.02 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Novelty (no) - implicit disclosure Usual manner on the effective date of this document - Only one usual manner on this date |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
When assessing novelty, it is not permissible to "combine" separate items of prior art together. Only the actual content of a prior document as it would have been understood by a skilled person on its effective date can destroy novelty. In the case of a prior document according to Article 54(3), the effective date is the date of filing or the priority date of the said document. However, in a case such as the present, where the document according to Article 54(3) refers to "a usual manner" of preparing a product, it is permissible to use documents of reference such as handbooks, encyclopaedia or dictionaries in order to determine what the skilled person would have understood by such a reference on the effective date of the prior document. |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t900233eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021