T 0448/89 (Stimulating electrode) of 30.10.1990

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1990:T044889.19901030
Date of decision: 30 October 1990
Case number: T 0448/89
Application number: 84100160.5
IPC class: A61N 1/04
Language of proceedings: DE
Distribution:
Download and more information:
No PDF available
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: DE | EN | FR
Versions: OJ
Title of application: -
Applicant name: Siemens
Opponent name: Biotronik
Board: 3.4.01
Headnote: 1. The requirement under Rule 55(c) EPC that the facts presented in support of the grounds be indicated in a notice of opposition is not met if several different subject-matters are described in a document cited as novelty-destroying and it is neither indicated nor readily recognisable which of them is supposed to incorporate all the features of a contested claim.
2. The requirement under Rule 55(c) EPC that the evidence and arguments in support of the facts presented be indicated in the notice of opposition is not met if it is neither indicated nor readily recognisable which of several documents mentioned therein is supposed to prove which fact presented.
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 99(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 55(c)
Keywords: Inadmissible notice of opposition
Facts, evidence and arguments not indicated
Insufficient substantiation of notice of opposition
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
T 0545/91
T 0919/97
T 0790/03
T 0938/03

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t890448ep1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

7 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: IV Divisional Applications

General Case Law