| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1988:T002887.19880429 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 29 April 1988 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0028/87 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 81103306.7 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | D21F 1/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
| Distribution: | |||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Kerber | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | If reference is made in the introduction to the description of an application or a patent to a state of the art which cannot objectively be classified as a relevant field that state of the art cannot in the course of examination for patentability be rated to the applicant's or proprietor's disadvantage as a neighbouring field merely on account of that reference (cf. point 5.4 of the Reasons). | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Inventive step - applicant's reference to a remote state of the art he art | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t870028ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
4 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)