| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1986:T002386.19860825 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 25 August 1986 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0023/86 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 80901785.8 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | H05K 5/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
| Distribution: | |||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Naimer | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.4.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | The question of whether a claim is "clear" in the sense of Article 84 EPC must be looked at in opposition proceedings only if the patent proprietor has made amendments referred to in Art. 102(3). Otherwise, the claim should be understood as it stands, having regard if necessary to the description and drawings. | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Inventive step Clearness of claim Claim/clearness |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: | |||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t860023ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
20 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)