| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1987:T029185.19870723 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 23 July 1987 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0291/85 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 79104244.3 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C08F 4/52 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
| Distribution: | |||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Bayer | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | If a citation gives detailed information about a further development of a prior art described only in very general terms without quoting a specific source, it is not permissible in examining for novelty to combine these general statements with the specific statements made solely in order to explain the said development unless a person skilled in the art would have made the combination when reading the citation. | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Novelty Combination of teaching of invention and reference of state of the art Inventive step (affirmed) Departure from prior art in conjunction with partial selection |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t850291ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
5 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)
