European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1986:T028884.19860207 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 07 February 1986 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0288/84 | ||||||||
Application number: | 78200273.7 | ||||||||
IPC class: | B01J 27/08 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
Distribution: | |||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | - | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Stamicarbon | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
Headnote: | If an invention relates to the improvement of prior art originally cited in the description of the invention, a feature (here: "activated" support) described in broad terms in the cited document but not mentioned expressly in the invention is sufficiently disclosed if it is realised in the examples of the invention in the form of an embodiment also mentioned in the reference document (here: activation by grinding). | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Disclosure Supplementing the claim with a feature form the state of the art Inclusion of such a feature in the precharacterising portion Amendment of claim Claim/supplemented with a feature from the state of the art |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t840288ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
4 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)