T 1101/14 (Inadmissible appeal/PIKSEL) of 12.12.2014

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2014:T110114.20141212
Date of decision: 12 December 2014
Case number: T 1101/14
Application number: 08743225.8
IPC class: G06F 7/00
G06Q 30/00
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: C
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 311 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS
Applicant name: Piksel, Inc.
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.5.06
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention R 99(2)
European Patent Convention Art 101(1)
European Patent Convention Art 108
European Patent Convention Art 122
European Patent Convention R 136(1)
Keywords: Admissibility of appeal - appeal sufficiently substantiated (no)
Re-establishment of rights - all due care (no)
Catchwords:

A representative who mistakenly signs a statement of grounds of appeal having most of its pages missing must, in the absence of special circumstances which could justify the representative's mistake, be considered not to have taken all due care required by the circumstances (see point 6).

Cited decisions:
T 1095/06
Citing decisions:
-

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t141101eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

8 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

EPC Implementing Rules

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: III Amendments

General Case Law