European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2016:T168912.20161005 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 05 October 2016 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 1689/12 | ||||||||
Application number: | 05756220.9 | ||||||||
IPC class: | C23C 2/00 C23C 2/20 C23C 2/24 C23C 2/40 |
||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | C | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | A DEVICE AND A METHOD FOR STABILIZING A METALLIC OBJECT | ||||||||
Applicant name: | ABB AB | ||||||||
Opponent name: | EMG Automation GmbH | ||||||||
Board: | 3.2.07 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Main request - could have been maintained in first instance proceedings (yes) (see points 1.2 and 1.4) Auxiliary request - addition of independent claims to the set of claims maintained in first instance - admissible (yes) - inventive (yes) Reformatio in peius - maintained claims in a set with other (added) claims cannot be challenged by non-appealing opponent (point 2.2.2) |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t121689eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021