| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2013:T197911.20130628 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 28 June 2013 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1979/11 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 01967300.3 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A23K 1/00 A23K 1/16 B01J 2/00 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Process for the preparation of granules of methionine | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Adisseo France S.A.S. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Evonik Degussa GmbH | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.09 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Exception from the prohibition of reformatio in peius - yes (main and auxiliary request) Amendments - Clarity and sufficiency of disclosure - yes Inventive step - no (main and auxiliary request) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
The fact that the broadening of a claim in appeal proceedings where the opponent is the sole appellant results from a reaction of the respondent to an objection raised by the appellant for the first time in the appeal proceedings may justify a deviation from the principle of the prohibition of reformatio in peius (point 2.1; T 1843/09 followed). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t111979eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021