| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2013:T050011.20130904 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 04 September 2013 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0500/11 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 04748762.4 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C01B 33/107 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Method for production of trichlorosilane | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Elkem ASA | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Evonik Degussa GmbH | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Disclosure of the invention: sufficient; no gaps in information Main request: Novelty (no) - end value of a prior art range takes away the novelty of the claimed range Auxiliary request: amendment - admissible intermediate generalisation - other features not inextricably linked to the feature picked out from a working example; novelty (yes); inventive step (yes) - improvement (yes); obviousness (no) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t110500eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021