| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2012:T001509.20121219 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 19 December 2012 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0015/09 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 01932895.4 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A61M 5/172 A61M 15/00 A61M 16/01 A61B 5/11 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | System for adaptive drug delivery | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Universiteit Gent | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Hovorka, Roman, Dr. | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Obvious correction (no - main request and auxiliary request 2a) Added subject-matter (yes - auxiliary request 1) Admissibility of late-filed request (yes - auxiliary request 2b new) Admissibility of late-filed document (no) Added subject-matter (no - auxiliary request 2b new) Extension of scope of protection (no - auxiliary request 2b new) Clarity and support (yes - auxiliary request 2b new) Sufficiency of disclosure (yes - auxiliary request 2b new) Novelty (yes - auxiliary request 2b new) Inventive step (yes - auxiliary request 2b new) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t090015eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
9 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
EPC Implementing Rules
Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application
XCLR II E 4.2.3 Obvious correction – immediately evident that nothing else would have been intended than what is offered as the correction