European Case Law Identifier: |
ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T229108.20101108 |
Date of decision: |
08 November 2010 |
Case number: |
T 2291/08 |
Application number: |
98929636.3 |
IPC class: |
B22D 11/06 |
Language of proceedings: |
EN |
Distribution: |
C |
Download and more information: |
|
Title of application: |
Continuous casting process for producing low carbon steel strips and strips so obtainable with good as cast mechanical properties |
Applicant name: |
ThyssenKrupp Acciai Speciali Terni S.p.A., et al |
Opponent name: |
Castrip, LLC |
Board: |
3.2.03 |
Headnote: |
- |
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
Keywords: |
Introduction of a new ground of opposition by the opposition division - substantial procedural violation (yes)
Reimbursement of appeal fee (yes) |
Catchwords: |
A ground of opposition (in this case Article 100(c) EPC) introduced by an opposition division under Article 114(1) EPC must be prima facie highly relevant. Given that, firstly, a previous board of appeal had expressly stated that the amendments were supported by the application as originally filed, and secondly, it is plausible from the application as a whole that the amendments are disclosed, it cannot be said that the allegations under Article 100(c) EPC are prima facie highly relevant. In these circumstances introduction of the new ground by the opposition division amounts to a serious procedural violation justifying reimbursement of the appeal fee.
|
Cited decisions: |
|
Citing decisions: |
|
11 references found.
Click
X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.
EPC Articles
Loading...
Loading...
EPC Implementing Rules
Loading...
Loading...
Case Law Book: III Amendments
Loading...
Case Law Book: V Priority
Loading...
Case Law of the Enlarged Board
Loading...
Loading...
General Case Law
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...