T 1366/05 (Polymer electroluminescent device/PHILIPS) of 18.10.2007

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2007:T136605.20071018
Date of decision: 18 October 2007
Case number: T 1366/05
Application number: 98945462.4
IPC class: C09K 11/06
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: B
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 24 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: Polymer electroluminescent device
Applicant name: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Opponent name: Merck KGaA
Board: 3.3.10
Headnote: 1. A written decision of an Opposition Division revoking a patent for lack of novelty to be reasoned in the sense of Rule 68(2) EPC must contain a logical chain of reasoning starting with the identification of that portion of the prior art used to justify the conclusion that the claimed subject-matter lacks novelty. The sole statement of the conclusion reached does not constitute a reasoning within the meaning of Rule 68(2) EPC.
2. Any reasoning arriving at the conclusion that the subject-matter of a claim lacks novelty must be proper to the deciding body. The mere summary of a party's submission is not per se a reasoning proper to the deciding body.
3. A written decision which is based on such a deficient reasoning is not reasoned in the sense of Rule 68(2) EPC, which failure amounts to a substantial procedural violation.
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 R 67
European Patent Convention 1973 R 68(2)
Keywords: Decision reasoned in the sense of Rule 68(2) EPC (no) - absence of reasoning proper to the Opposition Division - sole statement of the conclusions of Division - mere summary of Party's submissions does not reason the decision
Substantial procedural violation (yes)
Reimbursement of appeal fee (yes)
Remittal to the first instance for further prosecution
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
T 0278/00
Citing decisions:
T 1747/06
T 0831/07
T 0087/08
T 0534/08
T 0306/09
T 2158/09
T 2375/10
T 2474/10
T 2393/11
T 0184/15
T 1787/16

12 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law Book: V Priority

General Case Law