European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2006:T038804.20060322 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 22 March 2006 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0388/04 | ||||||||
Application number: | 99126154.6 | ||||||||
IPC class: | G07B 17/00 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | A | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | A method for responding to mail returned to a sender as undeliverable | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Pitney Bowes Inc. | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.5.02 | ||||||||
Headnote: | 1. The extent to which subject-matter or activities are excluded from patentability under Article 52(2) and (3) EPC is notionally distinct from, and may be considered independently of, the question of inventive step. 2. Subject-matter or activities that are excluded from patentability under Article 52(2) and (3) EPC remain so even where they imply the possibility of making use of unspecified technical means. 3. Subject-matter or activities may be excluded from patentability under Article 52(2) and (3) EPC even where they have practical utility. |
||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Patentable inventions - business, extent of exclusion | ||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t040388ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
18 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPO Guidelines - G Patentability
Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)