| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2005:T030004.20050421 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 21 April 2005 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0300/04 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 94120761.5 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G06K 19/16 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Transparent hologram seal | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Toppan Printing Co., Ltd. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Giesecke & Devrient GmbH | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of appeal - yes Most embodiments outside amended claims - not objectionable under Article 100(b) EPC Adaptation of description for post-grant amendment of claims - necessary under Article 84 EPC Late-filed requests not raising complex issues - admitted Fresh ground for opposition - not admitted into appeal proceedings Postponement of oral proceedings - refused Inventive step - no (all requests) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
A party's general desire to be represented by a specific member of an association of representatives is not considered sufficient ground for changing the date for oral proceedings (point 15 of the Reasons). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t040300eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021