D 0003/00 (Evaluation of merits of candidate's answer) of 3.5.2002

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2002:D000300.20020503
Date of decision: 03 May 2002
Case number: D 0003/00
Application number: -
IPC class: -
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: A
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 36 KB)
-
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: OJ | Published
Title of application: -
Applicant name: -
Opponent name: -
Board: DBA
Headnote: Headnote: As regards the evaluation of the merits of a candidate's answer to an examination paper a candidate is not per se entitled to claim for each answer to a sub-question or sub-element of an examination paper the highest mark awarded by one of the examiners whenever the two committee members (examiners) who have marked the answer in accordance with Article 8(b) REE differ in their marking of such a sub-question or sub-element (point 3. of the reasons).
Relevant legal provisions:
Regulation on the European qualifying examination Art008(b)
Regulation on the European qualifying examination Art008(c)
Regulation on the European qualifying examination Art027(1)
Regulation on the European qualifying examination R 4(2)
Keywords: European Qualifying Examination
Merits of a candidate's answer
Not per se highest number of sub-marks
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
-

4 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: V Priority