If the applicant, within the period under Rule 71(3), requests amendments or corrections to the communicated text which are reasoned (with regard to the reasoning required, see C‑V, 4.3), the examining division will issue a new communication under Rule 71(3) if it gives its consent (i.e. if it finds the amendments admissible and allowable; see C‑V, 4.6); otherwise it will resume the examination proceedings (see C‑V, 4.7). This also applies in the following cases:[Rule 71(6); ]
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/guidelines/e/c_v_4.htm
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
20 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Implementing Rules
EPO Guidelines - C Procedureal Aspects of Substantive Examination
XGL C V 4.6.1 Second Rule 71(3) communication reversing the amendments proposed by the examining division in first Rule 71(3) communication
XGL C V 4.6.2 Second Rule 71(3) communication based on higher-ranking request initially rejected in first Rule 71(3) communication