If the applicant replies to the communication under Rule 71(3) by simply disapproving of the text proposed for grant, not indicating an alternative text and not paying any fees or filing the translations of the claims, the following will apply:
If the applicant first files only the disapproval of the text and then (still within the Rule 71(3) period) files a request for amendment or correction, this is interpreted as a desire to proceed with the application as amended or corrected. The procedure in C‑V, 4, applies.
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/guidelines/e/c_v_4_9.htm
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
15 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
EPC Implementing Rules
EPO Guidelines - C Procedureal Aspects of Substantive Examination
XGL C V 4.6.1 Second Rule 71(3) communication reversing the amendments proposed by the examining division in first Rule 71(3) communication
XGL C V 4.6.2 Second Rule 71(3) communication based on higher-ranking request initially rejected in first Rule 71(3) communication