| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2013:T086210.20130515 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 15 May 2013 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0862/10 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 04755824.2 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G06F 9/46 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Positioning and rendering notification heralds based on user's focus of attention and activity | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | MICROSOFT CORPORATION | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.06 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Inventive step (main request) - no Inventive step (auxiliary request 1) - yes Clarity (Claims 1 and 24 of auxiliary request 1) - yes Clarity (Claims 2 to 23 and 25 to 53 of auxiliary request 1) - no |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
The choice of where to put an object on a computer display depending on a value assigned to that object (its "urgency") can not be considered to have a further technical effect. Furthermore, the movement of the object on the display in response to a change of said value is also considered not to have a further technical effect (see Reasons 3.3.1). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t100862eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021