European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2014:T223109.20140423 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 23 April 2014 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 2231/09 | ||||||||
Application number: | 05254923.5 | ||||||||
IPC class: | G06T 7/00 G06F 17/30 |
||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | C | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Methods of representing and analysing images | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Centre Europe B.V. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation |
||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.5.04 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Claims - clarity and support (no) Remittal to the department of first instance - fundamental deficiency in first instance proceedings (no) |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
see points 2.3 to 2.5 |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t092231eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
3 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application
XCLR II A 5.2 Restrictions on generalising the technical information and examples adduced in the description