| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2012:T223309.20120921 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 21 September 2012 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 2233/09 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 01200864.5 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | D21C 3/22 D21C 3/02 D21C 7/00 D21C 11/04 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Dissolved solids control in pulp production | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Andritz Inc. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Metso Paper Sweden Aktiebolag | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.06 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of the new grounds of opposition (no): no consent of the Patent Proprietor Admissibility of the new objections raised under Art. 123(2) EPC (no): their introduction during oral proceedings would have disadvantaged the Patent Proprietor Admissibility of documents submitted with the grounds of appeal (yes): reaction to the decision under appeal Novelty (yes): implicit disclosure of one of the claimed method steps not convincingly proven Inventive step (yes): unobvious alternative Apportionment of costs in the Respondent's favour (yes): adjournment of oral proceedings due to Appellant's conduct |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t092233eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021