| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2001:T011198.20010710 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 10 July 2001 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0111/98 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 91902807.6 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C02F 3/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | METHOD AND REACTOR FOR PURIFICATION OF WATER | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | KALDNES MILJOTEKNOLOGI A/S | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | E.V.U. - Entwicklung von Unwelttechnik GmbH Raisio Engineering |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Novelty - yes Inventive step - yes Remital - no Referral - no Late-filed document - admitted Clarity of amendment - no (main request) Extention of protection - no |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
Amendment of the claims in response to the citation of a new document during appeal proceedings is not as such a sufficient reason to remit the case to the department of first instance. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t980111eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
