| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2003:T009800.20030318 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 18 March 2003 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0098/00 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 92901898.4 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C10M 105/38 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Method for manufacturing a refrigerating system | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | MATSUSHITA REFRIGERATION COMPANY | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Cognis Deutschland GmbH | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Main request: inventive step (no) - obvious solution in view of the closest state of the art and common general knowledge First auxiliary request: extension of the protection conferred (yes) - Article 69 EPC not relevant for interpreting the claims within Article 123(3) EPC Second auxiliary request: introduction by the Board at the oral proceedings of a fresh document reflecting the common general knowledge - inventive step (no) - obvious solution Third auxiliary request: remittal to the first instance for further prosecution (no) Fourth auxiliary request: referral of a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (no) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t000098eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021