| European Case Law Identifier: |
ECLI:EP:BA:2002:T025897.20020208 |
| Date of decision: |
08 February 2002 |
| Case number: |
T 0258/97 |
| Application number: |
89307768.5 |
| IPC class: |
H04N 1/32 |
| Language of proceedings: |
EN |
| Distribution: |
B |
| Download and more information: |
|
| Title of application: |
Image communication apparatus |
| Applicant name: |
CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA |
| Opponent name: |
- |
| Board: |
3.5.01 |
| Headnote: |
- |
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
| Keywords: |
Inventive step (no) |
| Catchwords: |
The assessment of inventive step can only be based on the elements and aspects of the invention in respect to which a technical effect can be established. Whether an invention causes a technical effect is essentially a question of fact. While the EPO has a duty to determine such facts in examination proceedings, the onus is upon the applicant to cooperate in said determination, in particular in the event of doubt (see point 7 of the Reasons for the Decision).
|
| Cited decisions: |
|
| Citing decisions: |
|
6 references found.
Click
X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.
Case Law Book: I Patentability
Loading...
Loading...
General Case Law
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...