European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1999:T106696.19990708 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 08 July 1999 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 1066/96 | ||||||||
Application number: | 91104573.0 | ||||||||
IPC class: | G02B 26/10 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | C | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Scanning optical device | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.4.02 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
Keywords: | Basis of decisions - opportunity to comment (no): intention to exercise discretion under R. 86(3) EPC negatively not communicated before refusal Substantial procedural violation (yes) |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t961066eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
5 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Case Law Book: IV Divisional Applications
XCLR IV B 3.3.3 Criteria for admitting amendments filed in reply to the Rule 71(3) EPC communication