| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1995:T062094.19950613 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 13 June 1995 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0620/94 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 85103110.4 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G11B 20/18 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Rotary head type PCM recording and reproduction method and system | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | HITACHI, LTD. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Priority - translation of priority document Partial priority - alternatives in claim Publication in priority interval |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
Certified translation of priority document contained additional matter not contained in the priority document itself, this additional matter left out of account when determining entitlement of claim to priority date, claim covering two alternatives - one of which is not disclosed in the priority document. Prior art published between claimed priority date and filing date renders said one alternative obvious - not disputed by Proprietor. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t940620eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021