| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2016:R001614.20161021 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 21 October 2016 | ||||||||
| Case number: | R 0016/14 | ||||||||
| Petition for review of: | T 2122/12 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 06116943.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B41J 2/175 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Method of determining the droplet size of ink droplets released by an ink jet printer | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Océ-Technologies B.V. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | EBA | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Petition for review only against an independent part of the decision under review (yes) Objection raised after decision was given  Rule 106 EPC complied with (yes)  objection could not be raised earlier Petition for review  admissible (yes) Petition for review  allowable (no) - fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC (no) - failure to decide on relevant request (no) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r140016eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021