If, in response to an invitation under
Rule 71(3), the applicant has already paid the fee for grant and publishing or the claims fees, the amount paid shall be credited if a further such invitation is issued. This may happen where:[
Rule 71a(5); ]
(i)the applicant requests amendments or corrections in response to the first Rule 71(3) communication or requests the reversal of amendments proposed by the examining division in that communication (see C‑V, 4.1) and also voluntarily pays the fee for grant and publishing and claims fees (even though this is not required, C‑V, 4.2); and the examining division then issues a subsequent Rule 71(3) communication (see C‑V, 4.6 and C-V, 4.7.2), or (ii)after the applicant has approved the text for grant in response to the first Rule 71(3) communication (which requires payment of the fee for grant and publishing and any claims fees due - see C‑V, 1.1), examination is resumed (see C‑V, 6.1) leading to the issuance of a subsequent Rule 71(3) communication (see C‑V, 6.2). 16 references found.
Click
X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.
EPC Implementing Rules
Loading...
Loading...
EPO Guidelines - A Formalities Examination
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
EPO Guidelines - C Procedureal Aspects of Substantive Examination
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...