European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1999:T007999.19991203 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 03 December 1999 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0079/99 | ||||||||
Application number: | 91113152.2 | ||||||||
IPC class: | A61K 9/51 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | B | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Solid lipid microspheres having a narrow size distribution and method for producing them | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Gasco, Maria Rosa | ||||||||
Opponent name: | Yamanouchi Europe B.V. | ||||||||
Board: | 3.3.02 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
Keywords: | Article 123(2) - yes - derivable feature Article 84 - yes - meaning depending on the circumstances of the case Sufficiency of disclosure - yes Remittal to the first instance - yes |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
When considering requests for extension of time, the Board will take into account not only any reasons put forward but also the number of previous extensions (if any), the views of the other party or parties (if known), the effect of delays on other appeals pending before it and the general principle that all delays are to be avoided where possible. Similar considerations apply to requests to adjourn oral proceedings. In these cases however, the Board will also take account of the fact that, once a date has been accepted, exceptional reasons may be required to justify a postponement. (See Reasons, point 2.2) |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t990079eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
4 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Case Law Book: III Amendments
XCLR III D 1.2.1 Relevant criteria when time limits are extended upon request (R. 132(2), second sentence, EPC)