| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1997:T032595.19971118 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 18 November 1997 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0325/95 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 84300845.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G02F 1/137 G02F 1/133 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | A multicolor liquid crystal display | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Xerox Corporation | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Diehl GmbH & Co | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.4.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Inadmissible extension of the protection conferred (no) Inventive step (confirmed) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
The "protection conferred" by a claim in the sense of Article 123(3) EPC is defined by the terms of the claim (see Article 69(1) EPC), and is not dependent on the actual validity of the claim in view of the prior art. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t950325eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021