| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1994:T019992.19940111 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 11 January 1994 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0199/92 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 82109001.6 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C07C 85/06 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Process for the manufacture of ethylenediamine | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Union Carbide Corporation | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | BASF Aktiengesellschaft, Ludwigshafen Berol Kemi AB |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of Opposition (yes) Notice of Opposition - meaning of 'indication' in Rule 55(c) Notice of Opposition - not fatally defective for missing page Parties to appeal - Party as of right Inventive step (yes) - non-obvious combination of known features |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
Inventive step of a two-step process, combination of process features - non-obvious in view of the technical problem |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t920199eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021