European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T088390.19930401 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 01 April 1993 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0883/90 | ||||||||
Application number: | 85900952.4 | ||||||||
IPC class: | F03G 7/10 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | B | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | PROPULSION APPARATUS | ||||||||
Applicant name: | BOLESTA, Dymtro | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.2.04 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Sufficiency of disclosure (no) Oral proceedings and taking of evidence without the duly informed professional representative Taking of evidence by hearing the party |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
Taking of evidence by hearing the party is possible without the presence of the duly informed professional representative"; A person as specified in Article 133(2) EPC cannot himself act as a professional representative during oral proceedings before the Board; The knowledge of a person skilled in the art in the technical field of physics and thermodynamics is at least based on the generally accepted laws of thermodynamics. |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t900883eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021