| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2018:T059215.20181126 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 26 November 2018 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0592/15 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 07813483.0 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C01D 7/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | POLYMERIC CORE-SHELL NANOPARTICLES WITH INTERPHASE REGION | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Bridgestone Corporation | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Oral proceedings - held in absence of appellant Main and auxiliary requests include three independent method claims - appellant's burden to show compliance with Rule 43(2) EPC (yes) Late-filed requests Late-filed request - introduce new objections (yes) Late-filed request - admitted (no) Request to postpone the taking of the decision on the allowability of the appeal at least until a divisional application is filed (refused) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
A request to postpone the taking of the decision on the allowability of an appeal at least until a divisional application is filed would oblige a board to examine questions outside of the framework of the appeal concerned and is therefore to be refused (see Reasons 4 to 4.5). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t150592eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
11 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
EPC Implementing Rules
Offical Journal of the EPO
Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application
XCLR II F 3.1.4 No obligation to postpone a decision to allow the filing of a divisional application