| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2016:T048813.20160609 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 09 June 2016 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0488/13 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 03722596.8 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A61K 8/25 A61Q 5/10 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | COMPOSITION FOR THE OXIDATION DYEING OF HUMAN KERATINOUS FIBRES | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | L'Oréal | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Henkel AG & Co. KGaA Kao Germany GmbH The Procter & Gamble Company |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.10 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of late-filed requests (yes) - filed in direct response to objections raised by Respondents Main and auxiliary request 1: novelty (yes) - objection based on alleged prior use not reasoned Main request: inventive step (no) - alleged improvement not shown over entire scope of claim, reformulation of problem, obvious alternative Auxiliary request 1: inventive step (yes) - improvement plausible, means for achieving it not suggested by prior art Clarity - no power to examine |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t130488eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021