| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2016:T199412.20160419 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 19 April 2016 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1994/12 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 01274630.1 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C08L 9/00 B60C 1/00 C08L 91/00 C08L 95/00 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | RUBBER COMPOSITION | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Bridgestone Corporation | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | MICHELIN Recherche et Technique S.A. | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.03 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Amendments - extension beyond the content of the application as filed (no) Amendments - broadening of claim (no) Claims - lack of clarity no ground for opposition Sufficiency of disclosure - (yes) Inventive step - (yes) Declaration submitted with the statement grounds of appeal - taken into account |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t121994eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021