| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2013:T261911.20130225 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 25 February 2013 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 2619/11 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 02712622.6 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G01N 21/71 G01N 21/73 H05H 1/42 H01J 49/04 H01J 49/10 H05H 1/30 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | PLASMA TORCH | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Agilent Technologies Australia (M) Pty Ltd | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.4.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Claims combination extends beyond the disclosure of the application as filed (no) | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
Focus of the decision disproportionally directed to the structure of the claims as filed to the detriment of what is really disclosed to the skilled person by the documents as filed as directed to a technical audience rather than a philologist or logician, for which audience an attempt to derive information from the structure of dependent claims leads to artificial result |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t112619eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021