| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2013:T202009.20130305 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 05 March 2013 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 2020/09 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 00961101.3 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | H01L 51/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Organic electroluminescent device and organic luminous medium | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | IDEMITSU KOSAN COMPANY LIMITED | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Merck Patent GmbH | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.09 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of late-filed documents (no) Admissibility of late-filed claim request (no, second auxiliary request) Extension of scope of protection (yes, main request) Sufficiency of disclosure (yes, auxiliary request) Inventive step (no, auxiliary request) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
Applicability of the relevance criterion for the admissibility of documents newly filed with the statement of grounds of appeal (point 6 of the Reasons) |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t092020eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021