| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2012:T066708.20120420 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 20 April 2012 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0667/08 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 05012854.5 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | H01Q 1/36 H01Q 1/24 H01Q 1/38 H01Q 9/04 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Space-filling miniature antennas | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Fractus, S.A. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.4.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Added subject-matter | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
It is essential, when deciding on issues of added subject-matter, to identify the actual teaching conveyed by the original disclosure, i.e. the technical information that the skilled person reading the original disclosure would have derived from its content (description, claims and drawings) considered in its entirety. This approach might lead to the identification of subject-matter which has not been explicitly revealed as such in the application as filed, but nevertheless derives directly and unambiguously from its content. Literal support is not required by the wording of Article 123(2) EPC (cf. Reasons, point 4.1.4). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: | |||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t080667eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021